‘TIL UIM DO US PART: No UIM Coverage Under Policy of Insurance Because Policyholder’s Husband Owns Insured Vehicle

In In Yee v AAA Insurance, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Michigan Court of Appeals, issued February 24, 2022 (Docket No. 356603), the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decision and held that pursuant to the provision found in Plaintiff’s insurance policy, there is no UIM coverage because Plaintiff’s husband owned the subject vehicle and resided with her. The Court remanded to the trial court for an entry of judgment as to Plaintiff’s UIM claim in favor of Defendant.

To access the full article > https://bit.ly/35TQtGJ