No-Fault Newsline

Experience, expertise and common sense.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Sort By Practice Group

Filter By Date

Sort By Edition

Sort By Attorney

Not all proofs created equal: Court of Appeals determines inadmissible proofs insufficient to create question of fact as to whether plaintiff suffered serious impairment of a body function

Practice Group:
Published: March 21, 2016

An MACP-assigned insurer may not take time beyond the statutory 30 days to conduct its own priority investigation

Practice Group:
Published: March 17, 2016

“Step-grandchild” not a “relative” under UM policy terms

Practice Group:
Published: March 11, 2016

Reining in McCormick: Plaintiffs Face Hurdles When a Prior Accident Impaired Lifestyle

Practice Group:
Published: March 8, 2016

Court of Appeals May Invoke Rarely-Used Conflict Procedure to Reevaluate the Application of Res Judicata to Successive PIP and UM Suits

Practice Group: ,
Published: February 24, 2016

Not so Fast…Broadening the Chiropractic Statute Does Not Mean Broadened Coverage Under the No-Fault Act

Practice Group:
Published: February 16, 2016

The Tide is Turning in the McCormick Era

Practice Group:
Published: December 30, 2015

Like a Horse and Carriage: How the U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling in Obergefell v Hodges affects Michigan Auto Law

Practice Group:
Published: November 13, 2015

A Case of Mistaken Identity Proves Costly for DTE Energy

Practice Group:
Published: November 3, 2015

Court of Appeals holds that health care providers may sue no-fault carriers for PIP benefits, even where the injured person has refused to appear for EUOs

Practice Group: ,
Published: October 30, 2015
Load More