Newsletters

Experience, expertise and common sense.

Sort By Practice Group

Filter By Date

Sort By Edition

Sort By Attorney

Striking the Testimony of a Defense Medical Expert Due to the Doctor’s Failure to Comply with a Subpoena Duces Tecum Was Considered an Abuse of Discretion in a No Fault Case

Entrant’s Status Revoked

Sixth Circuit clarifies that §1332(c)(1) does not preclude federal jurisdiction over PIP cases

Who’s The Boss? MIOSHA Might Provide a Different Answer Than You

Court of Appeals rules that minority/insanity tolling provisions of Revised Judicature Act applies to written notice requirement in No-Fault claims, but does not allow a claimant to avoid “one-year-back” rule

Ladders and licensees

When Statutes Collide: Supreme Court Clarifies The Interplay Between Governmental Immunity Act And Provision In No-Fault Act Authorizing Third-Party Tort Suits

Duty to Defend Re-Emphasized: Insurers Need To Be Certain There Is No Duty To Indemnify Before Denying The Duty To Defend

“A rose by any other name….”: Court of Appeals reiterates that the open and obvious doctrine cannot be avoided by simply calling a premises liability claim one for “ordinary negligence.”

Court of Appeals clarifies that health care providers do have standing to sue no-fault carriers directly for PIP benefits