Whether Wet Restaurant Floor Was “Open And Obvious” Was A Jury Question

In Watts v Michigan Multi-King d/b/a Baha Fresh, ____ Mich App ____ (12/14/10), the Court of Appeals found that a recently mopped restaurant floor was not “obvious” upon “casual inspection” and was not similar to Sidorowicz v Chicken Shack, the case that determined that a blind man encountering a visible puddle of water in a men’s bathroom was open and obvious.