The Importance of Names: De Facto Assumed Name of Provider is Not Enough to Enforce Assignment

In the case, Insight v State Farm, Plaintiff claimed its name was an “umbrella name” for a number of entities, but failed to raise this argument or request a correction at the trial court level. The testimony of the Vice President of Operations alone failed to support Plaintiff’s claim that the assignment covered the specific facility at issue or that the claimant intended to assign his right to the specific Plaintiff.

To access the full article: http://bit.ly/2VKEHrV