Newsletters

Experience, expertise and common sense.

Court of Appeals Reanalyzes Dye – Owner or Registrant Not Required to be the Named Insured

Motor Vehicle Litigation / May 8, 2020

In Ayler, the Court of Appeals closely analyzed the Supreme Court decision in Dye, as well as MCL 500.3101, which ultimately held that the statutory requirement that “the owner or registrant” of a motor vehicle “maintains security for the vehicle” does not mean that the owner must be the one to acquire the insurance policy. Instead, the Supreme Court found that as long as a valid no-fault policy of insurance is maintained, it suffices for any person to provide the required security as a result of the vehicle being insured. Therefore, the Court of Appeals affirmed that the decision in Barnes and other case law suggesting to the contrary were overruled by Dye.

To access the full article: https://bit.ly/3bcwvnn

Other News

sw-redraw

Quality legal representation is the result of knowledge, economy & hard work

Best Lawyers 2025
Attorneys_2025_GOLD_ANNIVERSARY_75_YEARS_WEB-04
superlawyers
sw-attorney75

In the news

Experience, expertise and common sense.

White Paper
Apr 24, 2025

Secrest Wardle MI PIP Monthly – April 2025 Update

Newsletter
Apr 16, 2025

Supreme Court Limits Andary, Determines Provider Claims Controlled by Law in Effect When Medical Service Rendered

Newsletter
Apr 15, 2025

No Going Back: Court of Appeals Rules Against Use of Photographs Taken a year Later to Hold Premises Liability Defendant Liable