Newsletters

Experience, expertise and common sense.

Sort By Practice Group

Filter By Date

Sort By Edition

Sort By Attorney

Court Finds Summary Disposition Appropriate Where the Purported PIP Services Were Provided While Claimant was on Vacation

Should Have. Would Have. Could Have. Didn’t: Rental Agreement Controls Use of Vehicle for Purposes of No-Fault Coverage

Failure to Disclose Pertinent Information for a Lower Premium; Is It Worth the Risk?

Time is Not of the Essence: Court of Appeals Concludes That Undue Delay, Alone, Does Not Warrant Denial of Motion to Amend Affirmative Defenses

Rescission Not Precluded

Why Don’t You Release Me? Release Encompassing All PIP Claims Applies to Claims With Executed Assignment of Benefits

Third Time’s the Charm? Not So Much…: Michigan Court of Appeals Reaffirms That Fraudulent Statements Made Post-Procurement Must be Related to Inducement or Inception of the Contract

Res Judicata: MCR 2.116(C)(6) Dismissal is Not on the Merits. 2019 Amendment to One-Year-Back Rule Not Retroactive.

Lien On Me: Claimant’s Attorney Gets No Fee for Uncontested Bill Paid Directly to Provider

You Only Give What You Get: COA Affirms That Provider with Assignment Only has Rights Held by Assignor in PIP Claim (Pre-2019 No-Fault Reform)